Vesta 2.0 is coming soon! See our progress update: https://vestacp.com/docs/vesta-2-update
Search found 16 matches
- Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:35 pm
- Forum: DNS Server
- Topic: _kerberos error in logs
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2593
_kerberos error in logs
Hello,
I have found a lot of entries in the messages log file like that:
Jul 31 22:13:22 server named[1725]: client 127.0.0.1#34881: query (cache) '_kerberos.net/TXT/IN' denied
Jul 31 22:13:22 server named[1725]: client 127.0.0.1#44152: query (cache) '_kerberos.net/TXT/IN' denied
Jul 31 22:13:22 ...
I have found a lot of entries in the messages log file like that:
Jul 31 22:13:22 server named[1725]: client 127.0.0.1#34881: query (cache) '_kerberos.net/TXT/IN' denied
Jul 31 22:13:22 server named[1725]: client 127.0.0.1#44152: query (cache) '_kerberos.net/TXT/IN' denied
Jul 31 22:13:22 ...
- Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:26 pm
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Remnants in .conf file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4154
Re: Remnants in .conf file
I have seen some other post and yes, this is ok... Only core package was updated to 16:
http://forum.vestacp.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=11858
Regards
http://forum.vestacp.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=11858
Regards
- Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:50 pm
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Remnants in .conf file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4154
Re: Remnants in .conf file
Hello,
Updates option shows:
vesta Version:0.9.8 (x86_64) Release 16
vesta-php Version:0.9.8 (x86_64) Release 15
vesta-nginx Version:0.9.8 (x86_64) Release 15
I'm running on Centos 6.7 64 bits, only nginx, no apache...
Sergio
Updates option shows:
vesta Version:0.9.8 (x86_64) Release 16
vesta-php Version:0.9.8 (x86_64) Release 15
vesta-nginx Version:0.9.8 (x86_64) Release 15
I'm running on Centos 6.7 64 bits, only nginx, no apache...
Sergio
- Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:46 am
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Remnants in .conf file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4154
Remnants in .conf file
Hello,
This is not a request, but something that it looks like a bug...
I have just a server running only in Nginx and already upgraded to latest release, but I just noticed that the .conf file for the related domain has this code at the end:
include /etc/nginx/conf.d/phppgadmin.inc*;
include ...
This is not a request, but something that it looks like a bug...
I have just a server running only in Nginx and already upgraded to latest release, but I just noticed that the .conf file for the related domain has this code at the end:
include /etc/nginx/conf.d/phppgadmin.inc*;
include ...
- Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:32 pm
- Forum: Mail Server
- Topic: Email disk usage
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3081
Email disk usage
Hello,
I'm hosting some site with a little bit more than a hundred email accounts. All is working fine, but the email disk usage is growing big... Right now it's about 1.5 GB, Backups are also growing fast for this matter...
So my questions are:
+ Is there a way to free the email disk space ...
I'm hosting some site with a little bit more than a hundred email accounts. All is working fine, but the email disk usage is growing big... Right now it's about 1.5 GB, Backups are also growing fast for this matter...
So my questions are:
+ Is there a way to free the email disk space ...
- Tue May 24, 2016 3:35 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Two domains, one website
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5735
Two domains, one website
Hello,
I have two domains and I need them to point to just one site:
mydomain.com
mydomain.com.mx (I need this one to point to the above domain)
mydomain.com holds the full site and I need all the visitors to mydomain.com.mx gets redirected to mydomain.com
mydomain.com it's up and running with ...
I have two domains and I need them to point to just one site:
mydomain.com
mydomain.com.mx (I need this one to point to the above domain)
mydomain.com holds the full site and I need all the visitors to mydomain.com.mx gets redirected to mydomain.com
mydomain.com it's up and running with ...
- Sat May 21, 2016 3:38 pm
- Forum: Mail Server
- Topic: Whitelist for sending mail
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5517
Re: Whitelist for sending mail
Hello @XoXiLhJ0mn :
I really appreciate your time and efforts on explaining all this email process, this is a great community and, even if my problem it's not solved, I have learned something new...
Vesta is a great product and I currently use it for all my sites, and the community... the ...
I really appreciate your time and efforts on explaining all this email process, this is a great community and, even if my problem it's not solved, I have learned something new...
Vesta is a great product and I currently use it for all my sites, and the community... the ...
- Fri May 20, 2016 8:58 pm
- Forum: Mail Server
- Topic: Whitelist for sending mail
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5517
Re: Whitelist for sending mail
@skamasle : Thanks... He is already working on it, but it's taking some time...
@XoXiLhJ0mn : The spam problem its not on the server IP, but on the client side IP, I mean on the public IP assigned by his ISP... So no, I don't get it... Can you explain a little more how your solution will work on ...
@XoXiLhJ0mn : The spam problem its not on the server IP, but on the client side IP, I mean on the public IP assigned by his ISP... So no, I don't get it... Can you explain a little more how your solution will work on ...
- Thu May 19, 2016 5:29 pm
- Forum: Mail Server
- Topic: Whitelist for sending mail
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5517
Whitelist for sending mail
Hello,
Some client internet IP is listed at a few spam services, so he can receive mail, but not send. Is there a way to whitelist his public, fixed IP so he can send emails ?
He's working on cleaning up the IP, but it's taking some time, an he needs to send email now...
Any ideas ?
Kind Regards
Some client internet IP is listed at a few spam services, so he can receive mail, but not send. Is there a way to whitelist his public, fixed IP so he can send emails ?
He's working on cleaning up the IP, but it's taking some time, an he needs to send email now...
Any ideas ?
Kind Regards
- Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:51 pm
- Forum: Web Interface
- Topic: Backup directory exclusion revisited
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8060
Re: Backup directory exclusion revisited
Thanks skamasle, worked just perfect !!!