We are happy to announce that Vesta is back under active development as of 25 February 2024. We are working on v1 candidate and expect to engage more with the community over the coming months. We are committed to open source, and we encourage contributors to help us build the future of Vesta.
Search found 92 matches
- Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:43 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Its possible to exclude folder from backup?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4838
Its possible to exclude folder from backup?
Hello,
Inside a user i have a folder with about 400Gb of content. That folder is so big that si causing problems with Vesta Automatic backup.
Its possible to exclude only that folder from the backups instead of excluding the whole user folder?
Regards
Inside a user i have a folder with about 400Gb of content. That folder is so big that si causing problems with Vesta Automatic backup.
Its possible to exclude only that folder from the backups instead of excluding the whole user folder?
Regards
- Sun Dec 10, 2017 3:11 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Is Vesta Development dead?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1924
Is Vesta Development dead?
Hello people,
Last vesta update was more than a year ago. Just wanted to know if the development is dead.
Best Regards
Last vesta update was more than a year ago. Just wanted to know if the development is dead.
Best Regards
- Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:37 am
- Forum: RHEL/CentOS
- Topic: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8099
Re: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
Hello, Since i updated from Centos 7.2 to Centos 7.3, the fail2ban rule ssh-iptables is not working anymore: fail2ban-client status ssh-iptables Status for the jail: ssh-iptables |- Filter | |- Currently failed: 0 | |- Total failed: 0 | `- Journal matches: _SYSTEMD_UNIT=sshd.service + _COMM=sshd `-...
- Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:14 pm
- Forum: RHEL/CentOS
- Topic: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8099
Re: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
That solution did not work unfortunately.
- Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:46 pm
- Forum: RHEL/CentOS
- Topic: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8099
Re: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
Im using it:
I will try that solution i will give the feedback later.
Code: Select all
fail2ban-client version
0.9.6
- Fri Jan 20, 2017 2:42 am
- Forum: RHEL/CentOS
- Topic: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8099
Re: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
No errors showing in the log. Its simple not catching the failed ssh login attempts.
- Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:04 pm
- Forum: RHEL/CentOS
- Topic: Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8099
Fail2ban ssh-iptables not working
Hello, Since i updated from Centos 7.2 to Centos 7.3, the fail2ban rule ssh-iptables is not working anymore: fail2ban-client status ssh-iptables Status for the jail: ssh-iptables |- Filter | |- Currently failed: 0 | |- Total failed: 0 | `- Journal matches: _SYSTEMD_UNIT=sshd.service + _COMM=sshd `- ...
- Thu Apr 07, 2016 1:40 am
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Is it necessary to upgrade openssl to 1.0.2 version?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 23352
Re: Is it necessary to upgrade openssl to 1.0.2 version?
Well, since my server is running live website, I can risk to make any mistake. So I made a test on VirtualBox, then something very weird happened: 1. Install CentOS 7 64-bit minimal on VirtualBox; 2. check the openssl version, it is 1.0.1e; 3. upgrade the openssl to 1.0.2g and use above mentioned "...
- Thu Apr 07, 2016 1:35 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Upgrade MariaDB
- Replies: 9
- Views: 18553
Re: Upgrade MariaDB
Just make this steps: nano /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB10.repo # MariaDB 10.1 CentOS repository list # http://mariadb.org/mariadb/repositories/ [mariadb] name = MariaDB baseurl = http://yum.mariadb.org/10.1/centos7-amd64 gpgkey=https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB gpgcheck=1 systemctl stop mariad...
- Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:06 am
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Is it necessary to upgrade openssl to 1.0.2 version?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 23352
Re: Is it necessary to upgrade openssl to 1.0.2 version?
You don't need to. Centos apply's security patchs to that version.