We are happy to announce that Vesta is back under active development as of 25 February 2024. We are working on v1 candidate and expect to engage more with the community over the coming months. We are committed to open source, and we encourage contributors to help us build the future of Vesta.
Search found 101 matches
- Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: VestaCP is dead?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 24876
Re: VestaCP is dead?
Hi, VestaCP in active development Free version and paid version will be release in the end of January Our plans (January) Free version - Nginx + php-fpm - CentOS 7 / RHEL 7 support - Ubuntu 14.10 support - Fix for most popular bugs Paid version FileManager Don't worry We start to worry, releases ar...
- Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:29 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: VestaCP is dead?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 24876
Re: VestaCP is dead?
Well if the original devs won't show any effort it would be a shame for this project to die. Of course forking would be best solution to continue working on this superb panel. In my opinion, only 2 OS should be supported: Debian (Ubuntu) And Centos (RHEL). Those are most popular and fewer would give...
- Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:22 pm
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Incorrect open_basedir
- Replies: 24
- Views: 56165
Re: Incorrect open_basedir
Thanks your your answer, i fixed it myself, just can't believe they missed it.
- Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:55 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: VestaCP is dead?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 24876
Re: VestaCP is dead?
I believe they are struggling keeping this project alive from the financial perspective. Their team is small, only few of them speak English publicly, maybe they won't even welcome any new members. It would be better if they would offer paid additional modules like file manager, keeping main system ...
- Tue Jan 06, 2015 3:55 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: VestaCP is dead?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 24876
VestaCP is dead?
- Little to no forum activity from staff
Bugs are not being taken into account
Releases are very rare, even ones which have urgent bugs
- Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:52 pm
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Incorrect open_basedir
- Replies: 24
- Views: 56165
Incorrect open_basedir
When using basedir template, you won't be able to manage uploaded files, because open_basedir restriction is set only to the public_html. Is this a bug? Unknown: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/tmp) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/user/web/domain.com/public_html) in Unknown on li...
- Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:55 pm
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Init: PRNG still contains insufficient entropy!
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2457
Init: PRNG still contains insufficient entropy!
Hello, apache won't start because: [Mon Dec 29 13:47:31 2014] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Mon Dec 29 13:49:41 2014] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Mon Dec 29 13:49:41 2014] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication...
- Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:41 pm
- Forum: Web Server
- Topic: Permission denied errors in apache domain logs.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4533
Re: Permission denied errors in apache domain logs.
Make sure every directory in the path has X (executable) in chmod. Without it nginx STAT() will fail.
- Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:02 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: There is no real admin interface
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2130
Re: There is no real admin interface
It's supposed to be simple. There you get only most frequently needed options.
Adding additional settings would take a lot of time and would make panel bloated like cpanel.
Edit config files carefully and you will be ok. Plus you'll get familiar with the system and will learn something new :)
Adding additional settings would take a lot of time and would make panel bloated like cpanel.
Edit config files carefully and you will be ok. Plus you'll get familiar with the system and will learn something new :)
- Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:56 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Re-schedule Backup to once every 3 Days + Selective Baclup
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5569
Re: Re-schedule Backup to once every 3 Days + Selective Bacl
Do not use 0 for Sunday, doesn't seem to work. Use 7.