Vesta Control Panel - Forum

Bugs dont really matter. But what about a discovery of a vulnerability?

ok lets talk about other solutions. why don't we use virtualmin?

what are the downsides of virtualmin compared to vesta?

any opinions?

Please guys, don't compare a project like vesta with virtualmin. Too different. I prefer Vesta for business.

fremeni wrote:Please guys, don't compare a project like vesta with virtualmin. Too different. I prefer Vesta for business.

what are the "open source" alternatives to vesta? have you ever experienced any?

I've tried all. belive me. I can use Cpanel or Vesta, the rest for me don't exist because is not stable.

I like vesta because is stable, well documented and the structure has been made with an organization in mind.

But guys, I NEED THE FIREWALL !!!!!

about stable - they have sometimes bugs and not always this bugs fixed quickly... sorry, but this is thruth - I think they have not enaought resourses...

Alternatives - ISPManager - but it much more difficult.
Also didn't used it yet, but thinking that will in near future - http://ajenti.org/

even imperio doesn't recommend using CSF (config server firewall), I've seen other people using it with vesta without any problems.

ok, I will take the lead. Today I am going to install webmin, then csf and then csf webmin interface.

I am using vesta on a 1 GB DO droplet.

I host 20 web sites which all of them uses wordpress, but they don't get more than 50 visits per site per day.

My cpu is around %60, just because I am getting random attacks (xml rpc)

Disclaimer: i'm curious about Vesta's development and looking into use in my future projects.

But i see some ppl are asking for alternatives, and after using Cpanel, ISPconfig etc, i found there is only one that could replace them all: Kloxo-MR. It's a fork of Kloxo and better in all aspects and it's actively maintained!
I've been using it for 1 year and it works very well. As with all FOSS, it's got bugs etc, but the developer is fixing them quickly. Feature wise, nothing can beat Kloxo-MR! I might take some time to get started with Kloxo-MR, but once you get it running, you will love it. It's also got built it brute force detection, but i'd recommend using CSF together with it!
If you take a look at the forum of Kloxo-MR,. you will find out it's being used in production by web hosting companies.

And to people wanting to protect Vesta installations, i'd strongly recommened CSF. Without it, you really can't live long in this business. You will sooner og later be blacklisted.

At the same time, it's time to welcome Vesta as an alternative to existing web panels and for those without all the features of Kloxo-MR, Vesta will have a good future IMHO.

fossxplorer wrote:Disclaimer: i'm curious about Vesta's development and looking into use in my future projects.

But i see some ppl are asking for alternatives, and after using Cpanel, ISPconfig etc, i found there is only one that could replace them all: Kloxo-MR. It's a fork of Kloxo and better in all aspects and it's actively maintained!
I've been using it for 1 year and it works very well. As with all FOSS, it's got bugs etc, but the developer is fixing them quickly. Feature wise, nothing can beat Kloxo-MR! I might take some time to get started with Kloxo-MR, but once you get it running, you will love it. It's also got built it brute force detection, but i'd recommend using CSF together with it!

And to people wanting to protect Vesta installations, i'd strongly recommened CSF. Without it, you really can't live long in this business. You will sooner og later be blacklisted.

http://mratwork.com/ I am assuming this is their web page. The question is; does all open source control panel web pages have to suck?

this page is a disaster.. no screenshot, no install instructions...

by digging deeper I found the "features"

https://github.com/mustafaramadhan/kloxo/tree/dev

Features look attractive. Do you use it with CSF ? If yes do you admin csf through webmin panel?

They released it!!!

I've installed a new server and there is the firewall inside.