Facebook Debugger gets Error 500 On Rewritten URLs
Re: Facebook Debugger gets Error 500 On Rewritten URLs
Tell about this problem to module developer?Galaxian wrote: My friend has done further diagnosis and found that the crash is occurring in: mod_extract_forwarded
We don't know what to do from here.
Or try to use https://github.com/matsumoto-r/mod_extr ... ed_for_2.4 ?
Re: Facebook Debugger gets Error 500 On Rewritten URLs
You do realise that this makes VestaCP incompatible with Google PageSpeed Service, which is a powerful upcoming CDN service that's at least on par with Cloudflare?
If I were you, I'd address this problem for anyone else who may want to use the two.
If I were you, I'd address this problem for anyone else who may want to use the two.
Re: Facebook Debugger gets Error 500 On Rewritten URLs
Take a look - https://code.google.com/p/modpagespeed/ ... ail?id=635 - article about work mod_pagespeed and mod_ruid2
Your friend called different module. For test simple disable mod_extract_forwarded with a2dismod. But you don't test this? Why?
Your friend called different module. For test simple disable mod_extract_forwarded with a2dismod. But you don't test this? Why?
Re: Facebook Debugger gets Error 500 On Rewritten URLs
Google PageSpeed Service, not mod_pagespeed. It's a CDN.skurudo wrote:Take a look - https://code.google.com/p/modpagespeed/ ... ail?id=635 - article about work mod_pagespeed and mod_ruid2
Your friend called different module. For test simple disable mod_extract_forwarded with a2dismod. But you don't test this? Why?
Yes, it may be the mod_extract_forwarded's fault, but you are including it by default in the Vesta package and in it's current state, it renders Google PageSpeed Service incompatible. Well, not 100% incompatible - just with Facebook scraper, which is important.
Also, we have Apache 2.2, so can you explain why you're suggesting a module for Apache 2.4 in your post previous to last?
Re: Facebook Debugger gets Error 500 On Rewritten URLs
You use stable release, if pagespeed so important, then need to try other variants. May be in newer version haves fixes for your problem.Galaxian wrote: Also, we have Apache 2.2, so can you explain why you're suggesting a module for Apache 2.4 in your post previous to last?